Manipulating Alexa Isn’t What It Used to Be

Alexa ManipulationThere was a time a couple of short years ago that asking what the importance of your Alexa ranking in a forum would get a million responses that it was worthless and all of those people were right. I then ignored those discussions over the years because they were all exactly the same. That was until a recent thread on Digital Point Forums where another new webmaster posed the question and although it elicited many of the same “It is easily manipulated” responses, there were a few dissenting voices. Now being used to post count padding, I wouldn’t normally have paid attention but those denying the ability to manipulate it are people who I regard as pretty up to date and knowledgeable in these areas.

So being drawn into the thread I decided to post my same response from a few years ago outlining all the reasons it could bot be trusted for rankings under 100k. I figured maybe these usually informed posters just didn’t realize the wide range of tools out there for changing your ranking drastically. The response back was a simple and plain one: If those tools work so well even now, prove it and manipulate your own rank.

Now it is really common for discussions in forums to break down when people just keep saying prove it but in this case I felt it was a legitimate point. It was so easy when I previously changed it, it would only take a week or two to do the necessary tests with minimal effort and be crowned king of that particular thread. I love proving peoples wild accusations based on myth wrong so this was a perfect opportunity.

So the experiment begins. The first step to any manipulation is to just install the toolbar on a few computers, preferably with different IP address’s. I only have two that fall into that category so I put the bar on my home computer and my work computer. I don’t normally put what is basically “spyware” on my working computer but I thought it would be beneficial to the challenge and the small tweak of the firewall would be worth it. Normally doing this and setting the soon to be manipulated site as the home page causes enough refreshing to give you a huge boost. After all, each install in the old days represented thousands if not tens of thousands of computers.

Then I pulled out the big guns. I rooted around on my hard drive and found an old Alexa booster program and set the machine going. I’m worthless when it comes to programming but as far as I can tell, it uses a proxy system to access your site thousands of times through the Alexa toolbar, “spoofing” a unique visitor each time and racking up the brownie points. Just in case that particular program was blacklisted by Alexa, I also found a few more boosters via eBay and installed those. I couldn’t wait to manipulate the ranking down to like 35K and show how ridiculous Alexa is as a ranking system.

Now normally I would see results at the next update which used to happen every Sunday night/Monday morning. I’m not sure when it actually happened but before I knew it, this site which had a starting point of 402k rose to 403k at the next update. To be honest I was expecting for it to drop by about 250k in one go like the old days so I figured the update didn’t take my work into account YET. So I patiently waited for another update and it went up again to around 404k. Now this was getting ridiculous as it seemed all my efforts had absolutely no effect. It wasn’t until a few weeks later that it actually settled back down to around 350K. You would be tempted to say that a 50K+ drop was phenomenal but when you are in the 400k range it is pretty much meaningless. To this point I still haven’t seen a drop down past the 100k mark which would have normally happened within a single update.

The testing I did convinced me that Alexa is not as easily manipulated as it used to be. In fact, it doesn’t seem to be able to be manipulated at all. One area where there does seem to be inconsistencies still is the fact that webmasters tend to have the toolbar installed in way bigger numbers then the average Joe. This is turn means that webmaster resources like directories tend to have highly inflated Alexa values. In the above example, the 400K site is actually a very successful site of mine that pulls in huge visitors and 6 figures a year. In contrast, if you are going by Alexa numbers alone, you would think that this blog has significantly more traffic and potential for revenue. This blog, however, is nowhere near the numbers nor success of the other site. What this means is although Alexa can be off when it comes to the reach, it is still a good comparison tool for sites in the same industry.

So if the above is actually true and I am of course now one of the believers, is the previous myth that Google uses a bit of Alexa ranking in its algo still so dismissible? If it is no longer so easy to manipulate and the only existing problem is comparing sites in different industries, it’s not a stretch that Google would use it, even if as a very minor part of the algo.

If anyone has a manipulation tool they believe still works, please email or post a link in the comments and I will definitely give it a try. I will only accept the methods though as anyone just posting, “It is easy to manipulate” will be ignored since I truly believe Alexa has either achieved a critical point when it comes to number of installs or have limited the number of same range IPs it will accept as votes.

21 Comments »

  1. Comment by Harry

    Posted on October 25, 2006 at 10:47 am

    My site’s ranking has been dropped by around 5k since I stopped using IE with Alexa toolbar. I believe advertizing the alexa toolbar on your site also helps in getting a good ranking….have tried that before and it did work.

  2. Comment by Tyler Banfield

    Posted on October 25, 2006 at 10:54 am

    After seeing the same thread, I briefly played around with Alexa using nothing more than Proxify and an auto refresh plugin for Firefix. I did not spend much time on it at all, but I did notice a significant drop within a few days. If someone has some freetime on their hands, I believe it would be worth trying this on a long-term basis.

  3. Comment by Jason

    Posted on October 25, 2006 at 10:58 am

    Well, if you link to the plugin you used, I will give it a try. I want to set up the method exactly the same way you did to see if I can reproduce the effects

  4. Comment by Tyler Banfield

    Posted on October 25, 2006 at 12:09 pm

    Here’s the plugin link.

  5. Comment by Jason

    Posted on October 25, 2006 at 12:15 pm

    I have both running right now…We will see next update if it makes any difference at all. As far as Proxify, I just put in the url without changing any of the checkboxes and set a refresh rate of 5 seconds.

  6. Comment by mad4

    Posted on October 25, 2006 at 12:50 pm

    I doubt Google would use Alexa data simply because their own toolbar data is so much better.

  7. Comment by Jason

    Posted on October 25, 2006 at 1:06 pm

    Yeah, I had thought of that as a reason before but discounted it as Google would want to use as many (accurate) traffic and popularity tools as they could to make sure no one tool was skewing results. If Alexa was indeed more accurate then previously thought, I don’t think it is outrageous that they would incorporate it with the other 2.6 million factors.

  8. Comment by GuyFromChicago

    Posted on October 25, 2006 at 9:27 pm

    Great post man - you hit the nail on the head. What was easy as all get out a couple years back no longer is:-)

    Test site if anyone wants to have a go at it: http://www.alexatest.com/

  9. Pingback by Is your Alexa ranking worth anything? at Andrew Wee | Internet Marketing | Blogging | Affiliate Marketing | Adsense | Strategies

    Posted on October 28, 2006 at 10:32 pm

    […] After a period of testing detailed in Jason’s post: Manipulating Alexa Isn’t What It Used to Be […]

  10. Comment by Phynder

    Posted on October 29, 2006 at 1:59 am

    Outstanding! Thank you for the results. I have three internet connections - went to the trouble of setting up three windowz machines to test Alexa - saw no change. Still get people on DP saying - It is easy!

    Thanks for taking the time.

  11. Comment by Mike

    Posted on November 2, 2006 at 4:02 pm

    Thank you so much for going through the trouble to do this. It’s nice to see that someone want’s the facts.

  12. Comment by Vans

    Posted on November 3, 2006 at 7:26 am

    If a website have a ranking below 100K then you can say that this website have some traffic. One of my website raking went from None to 250K by just installing the toolbar on my PC.

  13. Comment by Chris Andrews

    Posted on November 5, 2006 at 10:39 am

    “Test site if anyone wants to have a go at it: http://www.alexatest.com/

    Surely your test is flawed by exposing your test url to the world?

    Unless, even with doing that it fails to make it. Then it’s even harder than reported. :)

  14. Comment by Kartik

    Posted on November 8, 2006 at 3:10 pm

    Mine is around 70k and the ranking drops significantly when i start using IE 7 instead of firefox

  15. Comment by David Leonhardt

    Posted on November 10, 2006 at 8:12 pm

    Hmmm. With all this talk of “manipulation”, has it ever occurred that the best way to manipulate Alexa is to drive huge amounts of traffic to the site? Even unqualified traffic? If a low Alexa ranking is integral to your business plan, then even unqualified traffic becomes qualified. One could use low-value PPC terms…or post provocative statements at forums that would get visitors…or use whatever is still useful of the old traffic exchanges…or “click here for a free link”…or, well, you get the idea.

    BTW, some of theat untargeted traffic might even be targeted and you might just make a few dollars on it.

  16. Comment by Chachi

    Posted on November 14, 2006 at 4:24 pm

    Just a thought here, but maybe there are other methods than using a widely-known proxy setup and an “off-the-shelf” alexa spam tool. I spend a bit of time trying to get around a certain website’s efforts to prevent spam. The interesting thing is, for the longest time, they did not look for the easiest ways to detect the spam. Recently they changed this little hole. But, I wouldn’t expect most other sites to use the same methodology when it comes to detecting abuse. In other words, if I were Alexa the methods being used here would be the first that I would go after. I still think there are pretty easy methods to manipulate your Alexa ranking. Clearly it is not as easy as it used to be if the setup being used here used to work. But, I am really not sure who cares about Alexa ranking anyway.

  17. Comment by Sucker

    Posted on November 16, 2006 at 10:57 pm

    Kind of like what David just mentioned, what about buying cheap autosurf traffic? One of those “10,000 uniques for $3″ deals. Useless if you want them to do something, but great if you want to increase traffic numbers.

  18. Comment by GuyFromChicago

    Posted on November 17, 2006 at 9:46 pm

    “Surely your test is flawed by exposing your test url to the world?

    Unless, even with doing that it fails to make it. Then it’s even harder than reported.”

    There’s not any real test going on. Everytime some loser starts going on and on about how easy it is to get a kick ass alexa rank I just throw that url their direction and they quit yapping. I don’t think that site’s ever even cracked the top 100K and it’s been around for more than year and posted in a couple different places where alexa manipulation is discussed.

  19. Comment by Niero

    Posted on January 4, 2007 at 2:33 am

    I arrived at this conversation late, but I’d like to point out that Alexa is pretty much dead on for my site. Compare my Sitemeter to my Alexa ranking and you’ll find tha the traffic spikes are almost exactly identical and it’s sense of pageviews is pretty much spot on. The real way to boost your Alexa rating nowadays is to publish your content on the social internet (web 2.0 sites) and see if you stick, which is legitimate traffic. We’re ranked around 6650 so far and climbing (toot toot). I won’t post links but all my stats are public and at the bottom of my site. Hope that helps as an honest case study.

  20. Comment by just-4-teens @ DP

    Posted on March 26, 2007 at 3:33 pm

    I stopped looking @ alexa rank shortly after hearing about it a few years ago. How could a 100 a day site outrank a 500 a day in alexa? easy because the 100 a day was webmaster related and they all had alexa installed. all the extra hits from the webmasters with alexa installed sent my ranking into the top 100k while the 500 a day site sites in the 400k range. I guess people should rely on alexa more often :/

  21. Comment by Riverbed Application Acceleration

    Posted on January 18, 2008 at 7:55 am

    Everyday it changes. Always trying to beat the system. LOL

    Justin

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>