The FLIRT Method of Crowdsourcing

Posted by Jason on March 29th, 2008 — in Society

flirt_42.pngProbably some of the best documentation to outline the foundations of Crowdsourcing, below is a summary of the main structure. To see the full research, you can read up on The FLIRT Model of Crowdsourcing by Sami Viitamaki

If you aren’t sure what Crowdsourcing is, you might need a little background first.

THE GROUPS

Creators(Core)
This is the group of people that is the most enthusiastic about the collaborative offer, and they go to great lengths in pursuit of creating something unique. They submit original translations as well as review others’ if given the chance that will earn them respect, status, acceptance, reputation, as well as material rewards. In other words, they are the competing to be the top contributor .

These will most likely be people consistently within our Top 10 and hold the highest rank
Critics (Inner Ring)
Critics are the people that do not produce like the Core, but are highly involved in the conversations. They criticize and offer development suggestions to creators but also act as evangelists to the wider audience by actively spreading the word about the stuff they like (or alternatively, stuff they hate) by e.g. blogging. They are often driven by a personal attachment to either the creators, the collaborative company (they might even work for the company) or the field of work, in which they perceive themselves to possess valuable expertise. Like the creators, they seek rewards in increased reputation and status, but in addition also gains in audience and authority. They seek less direct material benefit from the collaborative relationship, but are instead enthusiastic about the conversation itself and often seek to convert non-believers to their view.

Crowds (Outer Ring)
The larger crowd is participating on a much lower level of activity and involvement than the critics. They tag, recommend, rate, vote, send e-mail links to friends and sometimes write an occasional review. The interaction is therefore quite shallow compared to the previous level. There is however a great wisdom to be gathered from all this grassroots activity: their input elicited carefully, the crowds through their actions help organizing the alternative solutions and understanding their worth. They thus introduce comprehension to the community as they confirm the relevance and value of the best material produced in the inner core.

Outside of these groups are the traditional consumers that do not participate in any way to the collaborative offering, but instead only view content and perhaps use the product on offer.

THE ELEMENTS

Facilities
Facilities have to be in place for the participants to have a place for meeting and interaction. However it doesn’t mean that you have to build your own social network service from scratch. There are already networks in place which we can utilize. In addition, a hybrid service is also possible, in which some parts (e.g. discussion forums) of the community are maintained by you while parts of it (e.g. video content, etc) exist on a 3rd party service and are only displayed through us using existing technology (ie YouTube)

Language
The community are not stupid. They have to be treated with respect. Although this is already a well-worn principle, it continuously tends to be forgotten, most notably by large corporations with the most resources to pour into the issue. Fake bloggers and ‘user-generated content’ are bound for a beating. The communities worldviews and values need to be understood and appreciated.

Also the community’s potential social objects (photos on flickr, videos on youtube, jobs on linkedin, URL’s on del.icio.us) have to be recognized and utilized, since no community revolves around an idea of just having one (nor does it revolve around us, no matter how hard we wish it would).

Incentives
Nobody, not even your customers or biggest supporters like to work for free. The incentives required by the different groups vary, and some can be incentivized for less than others, and the issue has to be given very careful thought in engaging the community in an exchange meaningful to all participants. It is often (In fact it is rarely the case) not money alone that inspires the customer creators, but also, depending on the context, things such as fame and access to otherwise inaccessible channels or resources might prove as powerful incentives.

Most of the time, we will have to genuinely challenge your community and offer them a chance to enhance the quality of their life - even if it was just by the smallest amount - in order to stimulate them. Nobody is prepared to waste their free time to trivial, routine tasks with little or no ’show-off’ value.

Rules
Don’t expect a swarm of creativity by creating an open environment where everybody is free to do whatever might occur to them. Naturally, you have to think about, e.g. building constraints already for practical reasons, but also arbitrary constraints can be challenging, inspiring and produce unique and noteworthy results.

Apart from standards for the work you would like people to do, the rules of interaction need to be established for a fruitful conversation. At what point and how a community member needs to register can make or break a relationship very quickly.

Tools
The people obviously need to have access to the tools necessary to create and participate. These tools for the most part will need to be provided by you or it may be assumed that people already have them. Sometimes the distinction is not so clear cut and thus the question is always worth a thought.

In addition, you need to establish your own tools for gathering the results of the conversation and turning the collective wisdom into action

The Days of Customer Service Have Not Passed After All

Posted by Jason on February 14th, 2008 — in Society

axminster-logo.gifI don’t think it is just myself but the majority of bloggers that use their blogs to call out companies or websites that wrong them. I looked through past posts and so many of mine were to highlight the breakdown in useability and customer service. I have to admit that the trend is still towards the attitutide of Who Cares when it comes to resolving customer conflicts.

I had what I thought might be a similar situation recently with a leading woodworking supplier in the UK called Axminster. I basically had a bad experience and seeing as how the order was less then €30, I expected them to give the polite brush off at best. Instead they went the extra mile and made sure I was MORE than happy at their expense.

The lesson here is not the moral one that you should treat all people with a bit of respect but a business one. Rather then going elsewhere like I would have done had they not responded, I turned around and placed two more orders for €500. So although they may have lost on my first order, they most likely were able to get my lifelong business worth a hundred times any loss.

I know it is a cliche for most but the foundation of business is customer satisfaction. It is far cheaper then advertising (I didn’t mention how many times I have told people they are the place to go to), and the return on investment is higher then any other method.

Woodworking in Ireland

Posted by Jason on January 24th, 2008 — in Society

White Oak IrelandWith the continued success of the Online Business Guide below, it has freed me up to take up a few old hobbies I didn’t have time for previously. The main one now is woodworking. I’ve been building my own furniture and also taking on some commision pieces for the fun of it (I don’t make anything on them but it helps me learn more and more).

The hardest part has actually been sourcing good quality timber in Ireland. B&Q (otherwise known as Home Depot in the US) only has pine and even the timber they do have is as crooked as a Worldcom executive. After a few weeks of research I was able to find 2 places in Ireland that fit my needs (straight good quality hardwood timber).

The first is actually a really cool place which I would use exclusively but its a 2 hour drive each way (ouch). It is called the Lisnavagh Project. Basically it was a family farm that looked to providing quality Irish hardwood locally. They have loads of different timbers and if you are worried about your carbon footprint, the trees are felled within Ireland (most times within the farm). I’m no environmentalist so I prefer it because it is really high quality timber. The downside is that it is truly rough sawn and you need to do a decent amount of work to get it to finished quality.

The second source is Strahan Timber. Although they are a more commercial operation and probably sell 100 pieces of pine to 1 hardwood, they are very nice and easy to deal with. I use them as more of a location solution as they are only 15-30 minutes from where I live. The timber is in reasonable shape considering it is American Oak (Any time you ship timber halfway around the world it distorts). A good run through the thicknesser and its ready to use.

If anyone has any other sources (Preffereably on the Northern side of Dublin or in Meath), feel free to post a comment.

By the way, the picture in the upper left is the last piece I completed. A commisioned entertainment center made from English Oak (Grown in Ireland) and finished with just a few coats of Danish Oil.